Summary
Aligned on
- We want to compete nationally
- We recognize that admissions help is critical
- Most likely path to achieve this is varsity status
- However, we’ll explore all options such as university contacts
- Our dual mission is on-field excellence and participatory club experience
- We will ensure rugby opportunities for all Michigan students
Other significant notes
- Women’s team needs consideration
- Desire unity across teams, including Ann Arbor men’s club (aka the city club, and comprising the non-student Michigan Rugby players)
Outstanding questions
- How best to maintain unity if varsity + club is the chosen vision?
Further meeting detail
Present
- Matt Trenary
- Greg Rose
- Jeff Hagan
- Karl Seibert
- Mike Lisi
- Aaron Turk
- Bill Haldane
- Kevin Cunningham
- Wes Farrow
- John Moore
- Harvey Schiller
- Jake Bodner
- Tom Warburton
- John Palladino
Detailed notes
- Introductions
- Haldane re: Michigan Rugby “All I would know is winning”
- Rose
- Put a stake in the ground that we can work back to
- The one thing that will establish the club and give it a solid foundation is a field and clubhouse
- Question about women’s team involvement
- Yes, they’ll be involved and conversations have already occurred
- They desire varsity status
- Questions about what varsity means
- Athletics and Club Sports serve different missions, and therefore provide different administration
- Athletics is focused on excellence
- Club Sports is focused on participation and student-led model
- Athletics and Club Sports serve different missions, and therefore provide different administration
- Questions about club-varsity
- It used to exist when club sports was in the Athletics Department
- Mainly to promote some excellence among higher performing clubs
- Pretty much gone but some discussions a few years ago. Fell apart partly due to Club Sports and Athletics not taking it on
- Other schools have this status such as Penn State
- Depends on which department ultimately houses it but there could be benefits of shared services such as trainers or tutors
- Questions about men’s club
- This is focused on the collegiate side but if work here can help men’s club that’s a good thing
- No combined college / men’s clubs out there
- Schiller
- Connection to Air Force women’s coach Amy Rusert who leads NIRA and is pushing for varsity across the country
- Club sports was closer to varsity back in 60s
- Strong relationship with Athletics and Don Canham
- Treated differently than other club sports
- Voice of all the club sports at some point
- Club Sports Council leaders were rugby players
- Disappointing this relationship doesn’t exist
- Questions about scholarships vs admissions help
- Different things
- Scholarships
- Framework exists for NCAA women’s rugby for maximum scholarships
- Small schools out there provide help
- Likely few full rides
- Cal men don’t offer scholarships
- Perhaps don’t want to fund it
- Perhaps school doesn’t
- Admissions
- Getting into school, regardless of whether you’re getting scholarship help or not
- Athletics is currently the only way right now
- Admissions is the biggest separator of teams
- Any scenario without admissions help needs to come with lowered expectations
- Scholarships
- Different things
- Questions about 7s vs 15s as a multiple team varsity / club setup
- We have handled different sides within one team and haven’t seen a separation socially
- 7s team competing at CRC was a varsity experience
- Palladino
- Held ourselves to a higher standard
- No additional resources or access
- The whole thing off of grit
- If we had more resources that would of catapulted us further
- No real recognition of efforts
- Trenary
- Good example of differences of departments
- And it’s all on us! The U isn’t going to make rugby great unless we do the work here
- Trenary
- Palladino
- Various intermixed comments (mainly Haldane and Rose) about club and varsity
- Varsity deduced as the way forward, especially considering admissions
- Could have all the money in the world but would struggle if we can’t get rugby players on campus
- Want to see excellence through all teams
- Want to see unity
- Recognize varsity and club need to be separate given rules and administration
- But would lose a lot if not one entity
- Question as to what’s next? * Take our vision to the university - They’re supportive but will have critiques - But won’t do anything unless we’re driving it
- Question about U funding
- Likely not. At least we shouldn’t expect it.
- Schiller knows Ted Spencer the former Admissions director * Would be good to get his opinion on how to move forward toward admissions help
- Working group structures
- Forwards
- Haldane
- Rose
- Seibert
- Cunningham
- Palladino (communicated offline)
- Schiller
- Contacts
- Backs
- Moore
- Warburton
- Lisi
- Turk
- Bodner
- Hagan
- Bench
- Remainder
- Forwards
- MRF
- Here to support and could use additional help on board
- Anyone else who could help with this project?
- Bill and Greg mention Randy Gress. Will reach out.