June 11, 2020 Working Group Call


Summary

Aligned on

  • We want to compete nationally
  • We recognize that admissions help is critical
    • Most likely path to achieve this is varsity status
    • However, we’ll explore all options such as university contacts
  • Our dual mission is on-field excellence and participatory club experience
    • We will ensure rugby opportunities for all Michigan students

Other significant notes

  • Women’s team needs consideration
  • Desire unity across teams, including Ann Arbor men’s club (aka the city club, and comprising the non-student Michigan Rugby players)

Outstanding questions

  • How best to maintain unity if varsity + club is the chosen vision?

Further meeting detail

Present

  • Matt Trenary
  • Greg Rose
  • Jeff Hagan
  • Karl Seibert
  • Mike Lisi
  • Aaron Turk
  • Bill Haldane
  • Kevin Cunningham
  • Wes Farrow
  • John Moore
  • Harvey Schiller
  • Jake Bodner
  • Tom Warburton
  • John Palladino

Detailed notes

  • Introductions
    • Haldane re: Michigan Rugby “All I would know is winning”
  • Rose
    • Put a stake in the ground that we can work back to
    • The one thing that will establish the club and give it a solid foundation is a field and clubhouse
  • Question about women’s team involvement
    • Yes, they’ll be involved and conversations have already occurred
    • They desire varsity status
  • Questions about what varsity means
    • Athletics and Club Sports serve different missions, and therefore provide different administration
      • Athletics is focused on excellence
      • Club Sports is focused on participation and student-led model
  • Questions about club-varsity
    • It used to exist when club sports was in the Athletics Department
    • Mainly to promote some excellence among higher performing clubs
    • Pretty much gone but some discussions a few years ago. Fell apart partly due to Club Sports and Athletics not taking it on
    • Other schools have this status such as Penn State
    • Depends on which department ultimately houses it but there could be benefits of shared services such as trainers or tutors
  • Questions about men’s club
    • This is focused on the collegiate side but if work here can help men’s club that’s a good thing
    • No combined college / men’s clubs out there
  • Schiller
    • Connection to Air Force women’s coach Amy Rusert who leads NIRA and is pushing for varsity across the country
    • Club sports was closer to varsity back in 60s
      • Strong relationship with Athletics and Don Canham
      • Treated differently than other club sports
      • Voice of all the club sports at some point
        • Club Sports Council leaders were rugby players
      • Disappointing this relationship doesn’t exist
  • Questions about scholarships vs admissions help
    • Different things
      • Scholarships
        • Framework exists for NCAA women’s rugby for maximum scholarships
        • Small schools out there provide help
          • Likely few full rides
        • Cal men don’t offer scholarships
          • Perhaps don’t want to fund it
          • Perhaps school doesn’t
      • Admissions
        • Getting into school, regardless of whether you’re getting scholarship help or not
        • Athletics is currently the only way right now
        • Admissions is the biggest separator of teams
        • Any scenario without admissions help needs to come with lowered expectations
  • Questions about 7s vs 15s as a multiple team varsity / club setup
    • We have handled different sides within one team and haven’t seen a separation socially
    • 7s team competing at CRC was a varsity experience
      • Palladino
        • Held ourselves to a higher standard
        • No additional resources or access
          • The whole thing off of grit
          • If we had more resources that would of catapulted us further
      • No real recognition of efforts
        • Trenary
          • Good example of differences of departments
          • And it’s all on us! The U isn’t going to make rugby great unless we do the work here
  • Various intermixed comments (mainly Haldane and Rose) about club and varsity
    • Varsity deduced as the way forward, especially considering admissions
    • Could have all the money in the world but would struggle if we can’t get rugby players on campus
    • Want to see excellence through all teams
    • Want to see unity
      • Recognize varsity and club need to be separate given rules and administration
      • But would lose a lot if not one entity
  • Question as to what’s next? * Take our vision to the university - They’re supportive but will have critiques - But won’t do anything unless we’re driving it
  • Question about U funding
    • Likely not. At least we shouldn’t expect it.
  • Schiller knows Ted Spencer the former Admissions director * Would be good to get his opinion on how to move forward toward admissions help
  • Working group structures
    • Forwards
      • Haldane
      • Rose
      • Seibert
      • Cunningham
      • Palladino (communicated offline)
    • Schiller
      • Contacts
    • Backs
      • Moore
      • Warburton
      • Lisi
      • Turk
      • Bodner
      • Hagan
    • Bench
      • Remainder
  • MRF
    • Here to support and could use additional help on board
  • Anyone else who could help with this project?
    • Bill and Greg mention Randy Gress. Will reach out.